SITC 2026 recap from a melanoma and sarcoma oncologist: next-gen TIL, dual bispecifics, cell therapy in sarcoma, and why infusion timing may matter.

To provide the information your oncologist is not telling you or doesn't have the time to!

SITC 2026 recap from a melanoma and sarcoma oncologist: next-gen TIL, dual bispecifics, cell therapy in sarcoma, and why infusion timing may matter.

Three-year NADINA data showed something that shouldn’t happen: near-complete responders did substantially worse than partial responders — 62.3% versus 87.5% recurrence-free survival. One design feature separates NADINA from every neoadjuvant melanoma trial before it. NADINA mandated full lymph node dissection in every patient; PRADO left the basin alone in major responders. I think that may be the explanation, and nobody raised it.

For the first time, an individualized mRNA cancer vaccine has beaten standard-of-care immunotherapy in a randomized phase 3 trial. INTerpath-001 showed a 42% reduction in recurrence risk and an 8-point absolute gain in freedom from distant metastasis in resected stage IIB–IV melanoma — with essentially no added toxicity. Here is what the data showed, and the four questions I think determine how we use it well.

Four randomized trials and one excellent symposium defined day one of the melanoma program at ESMO 2026 in Madrid: an oral HDAC inhibitor added to nivolumab, a BRAF/MEK-plus-immunotherapy triplet, two trials pushing TIL cell therapy earlier and lighter, and a landscape in metastatic uveal melanoma that has changed faster than most providers realize. Here is the data as presented, and my take on each.

It’s been a while since my last post. That’s not for lack of news. These past several months have been some of the fullest of my life: clinic, program building, my directorship, speaking, consulting, the businesses my wife and I run together, and most importantly, being a husband and a dad to four kids. Writing …

What the disease is, why it clusters where it does, and how we fight it today

Three different problems seen in recent weeks— a steroid reflex, a test without a plan, a patient chasing a rumor — but the same underlying discipline: ask whether what you’re doing actually changes the outcome, and be honest when it doesn’t. As always, I welcome pushback and other perspectives — feel free to reach out. …

A melanoma oncologist unpacks the new Phase 3 personalized mRNA cancer vaccine data — what it shows, what’s still unknown, and the questions patients are asking this week.

After two rejections, the FDA approved a new melanoma therapy that finally reaches beyond the skin — into the liver, into the lungs. Here’s why the third try worked.

A mountainside peer-to-peer call, three organizations, and one melanoma patient who now has a shot at TIL therapy — a look at what happens when payers, manufacturers, and providers actually move together.